Expert validation of a teamwork assessment rubric: A modified Delphi study.

نویسندگان

  • Jenny A Parratt
  • Kathleen M Fahy
  • Marie Hutchinson
  • Gui Lohmann
  • Carolyn R Hastie
  • Marilyn Chaseling
  • Kylie O'Brien
چکیده

BACKGROUND Teamwork is a 'soft skill' employability competence desired by employers. Poor teamwork skills in healthcare have an impact on adverse outcomes. Teamwork skills are rarely the focus of teaching and assessment in undergraduate courses. The TeamUP Rubric is a tool used to teach and evaluate undergraduate students' teamwork skills. Students also use the rubric to give anonymised peer feedback during team-based academic assignments. The rubric's five domains focus on planning, environment, facilitation, conflict management and individual contribution; each domain is grounded in relevant theory. Students earn marks for their teamwork skills; validity of the assessment rubric is critical. QUESTION To what extent do experts agree that the TeamUP Rubric is a valid assessment of 'teamwork skills'? DESIGN Modified Delphi technique incorporating Feminist Collaborative Conversations. PARTICIPANTS A heterogeneous panel of 35 professionals with recognised expertise in communications and/or teamwork. METHODS Three Delphi rounds using a survey that included the rubric were conducted either face-to-face, by telephone or online. Quantitative analysis yielded item content validity indices (I-CVI); minimum consensus was pre-set at 70%. An average of the I-CVI also yielded sub-scale (domain) (D-CVI/Ave) and scale content validity indices (S-CVI/Ave). After each Delphi round, qualitative data were analysed and interpreted; Feminist Collaborative Conversations by the research team aimed to clarify and confirm consensus about the wording of items on the rubric. RESULTS Consensus (at 70%) was obtained for all but one behavioural descriptor of the rubric. We modified that descriptor to address expert concerns. The TeamUP Rubric (Version 4) can be considered to be well validated at that level of consensus. The final rubric reflects underpinning theory, with no areas of conceptual overlap between rubric domains. CONCLUSION The final TeamUP Rubric arising from this study validly measures individual student teamwork skills and can be used with confidence in the university setting.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) through simulation: Pilot investigation

Background: Simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. The aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborative Assessment tool (ICAR) in an Iranian context using simulation.   Methods: In this descriptive study, contextualization of the ICAR was assessed throug...

متن کامل

Assessment of the interprofessional collaboration of healthcare team members: validation of Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) and pilot study

Background and Aim: Developing Interprofessional education and collaboration is important in systems of medical sciences to deliver better health care. The present study aimed to assess the validation of the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR) (validity, reliability and confirmatory factor analysis). Also, the interprofessional collaboration of the healthcare team members in...

متن کامل

Contextualization and validation of the interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (ICAR) through simulation: Pilot investigation

BACKGROUND Simulation can be used for educating, evaluating and assessing psychometric properties of an instrument. The aim of this study was to contextualize and assess the validity and reliability of the Interprofessional Collaborative Assessment tool (ICAR) in an Iranian context using simulation. METHODS In this descriptive study, contextualization of the ICAR was assessed through several ...

متن کامل

Towards development and validation of an intraoperative assessment tool for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy training: results of a Delphi study

INTRODUCTION As urology training shifts toward competency-based frameworks, the need for tools for high stakes assessment of trainees is crucial. Validated assessment metrics are lacking for many robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). As it is quickly becoming the gold standard for treatment of localized prostate cancer, the development and validation of a RARP assessment tool for trainin...

متن کامل

Title: “Managing Subjectivity in Qualitative Risk Assessment of Communication Networks

Security assessments for communication networks play an important risk management role because they allow risks to be prioritized for mitigation or risk acceptance. Qualitative risk assessments that involve intangible elements require the subjective judgment of the security analyst completing the risk assessment and this may lead to low confidence in the results due to a perception that evaluat...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Nurse education today

دوره 36  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016